Skip to main content

I-93 Sign Replacement Project Update

Decided to beat the Memorial Day rush and traveled up I-93 north of Boston Wednesday afternoon to check out the progress of the two sign replacement projects. Based on webcam images, I new some signs had been replaced at the southern and northern end of the Somerville to Exit 38 segment. Turns out signage has been updated northbound for Exit 28 (MA 28/38), the first sign for Exit 31 (MA 16) (I guess taking advantage of MassDOT closing I-93 between Exits 20 and 28 for Big Dig Tunnel maintenance a couple nights a month) and for Exits 34 to 38. A photographic summary starts with the first re-signed exit:
This is the second overhead assembly. The signs are mounted on the previously existing overhead supports that go back to the opening of the lower and upper deck portions of I-93 in the early 1970's. I don't know about using the left hand side simply for an auxiliary sign for the exit, but there isn't much room to place it elsewhere.

The next interchange that  has had all of its signs updated northbound is Exit 34, MA 28:
This is the second MA 28 exit in a row, and the third involving the route in the last 6 exits. The new signage at the exit ramp itself :
You'll notice that while the signage has been updated, work could be done to improve the painted surfaces of the bridge beyond. 

The next exit is for Montvale Avenue:

The orange barrels beyond were for the construction crews. They were working in the median over the hill, do not know if it was sign related or not.

Before Montvale Ave. you get the first notice of the upcoming I-95 interchange:
Unlike at the southern I-93/I-95 interchange there are no fancy diagrammatic signs. Given the current cloverleaf design, they are not allowed under MUTCD. Maybe they will appear if the interchange is revised with flyover ramps as MassDOT has proposed. Here's a closeup of the I-93 sign in the distance:
The size of the shield is standard issue for MassDOT, though ironically the new I-95/MA 128 reassurance markers put up for that sign project are both on one post.

The next new sign for Montvale Ave. was obscured by the older overhead assembly that had not been taken down as of yet. Approaching within a mile of the I-95 exit:
Notice the large auxiliary MA 128 sign. MassDOT sign standards specifically prohibit any '128' shield from accompanying I-95 on highway and approaching highway signage between Canton and Peabody. Only one of the signs approaching the interchange had been put up:

The older sign in the distance was removed a day after this photo was taken. It is interesting that there is only one local control city on the new sign. Other signs along I-95 to the south typically use Portsmouth NH alone or with a local destination. Apparently the FHWA has agreed to letting MassDOT use local cities here. You would think there would be some benefit to having a sign indicating you can take I-95 to access coastal NH or Maine. Perhaps they think all long distance traffic on this part of I-93 originates from the Boston area and those people would take US 1 or know I-95 gets off of 128 in Peabody.

Beyond I-95 there are two more revised signage exits:
The destinations on these exit signs have expanded beyond the original Commerce Way, with RTC for Regional Transportation Center. Also hope some day this will not be a suffixed exit with the introduction of mile-based exit numbering (more below). The last exit with new signage is that for MA 129:
This is the last interchange under the southern replacement contract. To the north there were new foundations placed for the new overhead signs, but nothing more. Turning around to head southbound at Exit 39, I was able to take a picture of the typical MGS or Mass. Guide (or Green) Sign at I-93 on-ramps:
Apparently MassDOT believes Boston is the only destination travelers need to know.

Heading back toward Boston, southbound signs have been replaced from Exits 38 to (the first two for) 35. Starting out beyond Exit 39:
Notice the Deer Crossing sign. If MassDOT was reflecting the reality of the high deer population they would probably have to place on after nearly every exit nowadays.

Heading further south approaching Exit 38:
Again the signs look great, but maybe a little repainting of the bridge would be nice. The second overhead assembly for MA 129 introduces I-95 into the mix:
Again I-95 features local control cities, other signs along I-95 to the south have Providence, RI alone or with another local city. Maybe they do not to encourage more traffic along the '128' Belt? Notice the orange contractor tag and barrel have not been removed, perhaps more work needed.

At the 1 Mile mark to I-95:
You again have the auxiliary sign for MA 128 off to the right. These signs next appear at the interchange itself:
Just a part of one made it at this photo approaching the I-95 South off-ramp. There was not one for the northbound ramp (they are at both ramps heading northbound). The next exit is Montvale Avenue:
The Series 'E' or Service signs were replaced last year. Does having those replace first indicate the priorities of MassDOT or does it take more effort to plan placing the overheads?

Here's another new I-93 shield:
Next to an older Distance sign. I do not know whether these distances are correct, many of the signs put up several years ago had to be corrected because of wrong numbers.

The last exit with new signage is Exit 35:
'Park St.' Stoneham/Melrose is a new designation for this exit, the previous sign listing 'Winchester Highlands.' Direct access to this destination, no longer exists, so MassDOT changed it to Stoneham and Melrose as destinations and added Park Street to help differentiate this exit from other Stoneham exits for drivers.

While there were no more new on road signage along this direction until Somerville, they have replaced some of the overhead ramp signage, such as at Exit 33:
Notice the 'control cities' feature a street name. The street is 'Fellsway West' but might this be confusing to drivers seeing North/West on one sign and South/West on another, thinking it should be 'East'? The next signs are less confusing:
The work on the right is replacing the guardrails at the interchange, part of a project putting up sound barrier walls along this stretch of I-93 (seen in the background).

This last photo is the signage at the Leverett Connector exit:
This signage was put up as well, again taking advantage of I-93 Big Dig Tunnel closures, the lower text for Exit 28 is new, with the addition of Assembly Square, a new development going in at the site of an old mall. The Exit 26 signage was relatively new, but the new sign is larger and taller. I also like having part of the Boston skyline in the background. (MA 3 should be US 3 here, if it was up to me).

I always thought that sign update projects like this would be a good time for MassDOT to change to mile-based exit numbering from (somewhat) consecutive exit numbers. Since that has not happened, I thought I'd post what the exit numbers should be for the exits in the southern sign replacement project area:

Northbound:
Exit                            Current Number                  Milepost*           Mile Based Number
MA 28/38                          29                                      20.4                          20
MA 16                               31                                      22.1                         22
MA 60 Medford Sq.           32                                      22.5                          23A
MA 28 Fellsway W.           33                                      23.2                          23B
MA 28 Stoneham              34                                      25.3                          25
Montvale Ave.                    36                                      26.9                          27
I-95/MA 128                       37                                      28.4                          28
Commerce Way                37C                                    29.9                          30
MA 129                             38                                      31.1                          31

Southbound:
Exit                            Current Number                 Milepost*           Mile Based Number
MA 129                            38                                      31.1                          31
Commerce Way               37C                                    29.9                          30
I-95/MA 128                      37                                      28.4                          28
Montvale Ave.                   36                                      26.9                          27
Park St.                            35                                      26.0                          26
MA 28 Stoneham              34                                      25.3                          25 
MA 28 Fellsway W.           33                                      23.2                          23B
MA 60 Medford Sq.           32                                     22.5                          23A 
MA 16                              31                                     22.1                          22  
MA 28/38                         30                                      20.4                          20B
Sullivan Square                28                                      20.1                          20A

*Milepost figures downloaded from Mass Exec. Office of Transportation, 2007 Interchange Table 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Nice stuff and a lot of it there, thanks for posting! Glad they got all those signs done before Clearview uglybug bit. - David S.

Popular posts from this blog

Check the box: Interstate 495 to 87 conversion administratively approved

The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials have recently approved North Carolina's application to remove the short-lived Interstate 495 and future I-495 from Raleigh to Rocky Mount.  This administrative move most likely will result in North Carolina signing Interstate 87 and Future I-87 on the entire corridor in the near future.

Approved in 2013, Interstate 495 was first signed in 2014 along US 64 from Interstate 440 in Raleigh to Interstate 540 in Knightdale.  The remaining segment of highway to Rocky Mount was signed as Future Interstate 495.  However, in 2016, North Carolina's congressional legislators were able to get language in the 2015 FAST ACT designating the US 64/US 13/US 17 corridor from Raleigh to Norfolk as an Interstate.  In 2016, the FHWA and AASHTO designated this entire corridor (including the existing Interstate and Future 495) as Interstate 87.  (NCDOT had applied for Interstate 89 along this route.)

It is currently unknown when t…

The story on how the unbuilt US 40 Expressway in Brownsville took 40 years to complete.

For nearly four decades, the four lane US 40 just east of Brownsville came to an abrupt end - shown in the photo above - at Grindstone Road in Redstone Township.   In the late 1960s, what was then the Pennsylvania Division of Highways (PennDOH) extended a new four lane alignment of US 40 eastwards from Broadway Street slightly over one mile to Grindstone Road where an incomplete diamond interchange was built.  Earlier in the decade, PennDOH had built a four lane US 40 in Washington County into Brownsville complete with a new crossing over the Monongahela River known as the Lane Bane Bridge.  This new highway and bridge allowed US 40 to bypass the older Intercounty Bridge and downtown Brownsville. 

After this new highway opened, nothing would happen to it for nearly forty years.  US 40 traffic would use the ramps for this planned diamond interchange and then jog on Grindstone Road briefly before continuing towards Uniontown on the original National Road. 
What is unknown (at least to…

Starrucca Viaduct

Even older than the Tunkhannock Viaduct is the Starrucca Viaduct, built in 1848. Located in the far northeastern Pennsylvania borough of Lanesboro, this impressive bridge carried the New York and Erie Railroad over a valley as well as the Starrucca Creek and is currently the oldest stone arch railroad in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1). An engineering marvel of its time, and even in today's world, the 1080 foot length, 100 foot height and 25 foot width (2) of the viaduct is simply spectacular. Using local materials such as Pennsylvania bluestone, the Starrucca Viaduct has stood the test of time.With a price estimated at $325,000 in 1848 dollars, the bridge was one of the largest and costliest stone arch railroad bridges built in America at its time (3) . However, the very material that made it expensive to build gave the Starrucca Viaduct much durabilitycompared to other viaducts built in that era.

I've happened to check out the Starrucca Viaduct on a few occasions sin…